Purchase This Domain

This domain is a Michael A. Wills domain holdings property and is available for purchase. Contact us or submit your confidential offer to domains at willslaw.ca for consideration and response. Discover more domain properties for sale on our domains for sale listing page.

Quick-check the ahrefs domain rating and link profile: click here.

Minimum offer: $1,290.00 (USD)

Active Sites Not for Sale

Terminated.Law

Employment lawyer for: termination

Weclose.Law

Residential real estate lawyer for: agreement of purchase and sale

Employer.Law

Management-side employment lawyer for: employment standards

More Top Domains for Sale

Latest Posts from Terminated.Law

Latest Posts from Weclose.Law

Recent Decisions from Ontario Court of Appeal

  • Pateman v. Koolatron Corporation, 2025 ONCA 224 (CanLII)
    on March 24, 2025

    Labour and employment — Wrongful dismissal — Termination of employment — Whether the respondent was wrongfully dismissed or voluntarily retired — Employer provided written notice of termination citing shortage of work and issued a record of employment — Trial judge’s finding of termination without cause upheld — Governing principles for determining wrongful dismissal and voluntary resignationTorts — Mitigation of damages — Duty to mitigate — Whether the respondent failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate damages — Trial judge deducted 3 months for lack of reasonable mitigation — Appellant failed to prove that reasonable efforts would have resulted in mitigating employment — Governing rule from Lake v. La Presse, 2022 ONCA 742Torts — Mitigation of damages — Part-time employment — Whether the respondent was obligated to accept part-time employment with the appellant — Trial judge found no concrete offer of part-time work — No breach of duty to mitigate established — Governing principles for assessing mitigation obligations in employment lawObligations — Damages — Calculation errors — Whether the trial judge made a mathematical error in calculating damages — Trial judge double-counted the deduction for actual notice of termination — Damages recalculated to correct the error, increasing the award to $88,509.05 — Governing principles for correcting mathematical errors in damage awards

  • R. v. Bechamp, 2025 ONCA 233 (CanLII)
    on March 24, 2025

    Constitution — Charter of Rights — Section 11(b) — Right to be tried within a reasonable time — Stay of proceedings granted by trial judge due to delay — Crown appeal dismissed — Did the trial judge err in concluding that last-minute trial dates did not constitute defence delay? — Application of Jordan principles to determine unreasonable delay — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(b)Rights and freedoms — Charter of Rights — Section 11(b) — Right to be tried within a reasonable time — Trial judge found case lacked sufficient complexity to invoke exceptional circumstances exception under Jordan principles — Crown appeal dismissed — Did the trial judge err in finding the case was not sufficiently complex? — Framework for assessing complexity under Jordan principles — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(b)Criminal procedure — Delay — Jordan principles — Stay of proceedings granted due to unreasonable delay — Crown appeal dismissed — Offering of earlier trial dates at the last minute not considered defence delay — Case not sufficiently complex to invoke exceptional circumstances exception — Application of Jordan framework to assess delay and complexity

  • Sutherland Estate v. Murphy, 2025 ONCA 227 (CanLII)
    on March 24, 2025

    Constitution — Charter of Rights — Section 11(c) — Civil contempt proceedings — Application of section 11(c) to civil contempt hearings, including sentencing — Whether civil contempt is quasi-criminal in nature, attracting Charter protections — Does section 11(c) apply to coercive and punitive contempt proceedings? — Section 11(c) prohibits compelled testimony in quasi-criminal proceedings — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(c)Rights and freedoms — Charter protections — Self-incrimination — Section 11(c) of the Charter — Whether compelling testimony in civil contempt proceedings violates the right against self-incrimination — Application of section 11(c) to sentencing — Charter protections extend to quasi-criminal proceedings until final resolution — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(c)Evidence — Compelled testimony — Use of compelled evidence in contempt proceedings — Whether compelled testimony was improperly used to establish liability and sentencing — Expert evidence based on compelled testimony — Admissibility of expert evidence in contempt hearings — Compelled testimony cannot be used to prove contempt or justify sentencing — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(c)Evidence — Standard of proof — Proof beyond a reasonable doubt — Contempt for failure to produce deleted data — Whether the existence of deleted data was proved beyond a reasonable doubt — Expert evidence based on supposition rather than fact — Rejection of exculpatory evidence insufficient to establish guilt — Standard of proof in contempt proceedings — Carey v. Laiken, 2015 SCC 17Civil procedure — Procedural fairness — Clarity of allegations in contempt proceedings — Whether the motion judge failed to clearly identify the third act of contempt as a separate allegation — Procedural fairness in self-represented litigant cases — Use of potentially biased expert evidence — Procedural safeguards in contempt hearings — Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 60.11(4)